Posted by Mike Bawden under Uncategorized
Comments Off
How do you agree to include this in a news release, or even worse, let your spokesperson actually say this to the media:
“With time shifted data, there have been occurrences when demographic projections (in units) for ‘live plus same day’ are lower than for ‘live’ projections (units) … This difference can be attributed to the imputed VCR record activity which is calculated from household tuning activity that includes VCR record and household tuning that excludes VCR record. The VCR adjustment factor is applied to each building block emographic at the quarter-hour level for both programs and time periods.”
Steve Hall and the Adrants blog takes a swing at Nielson in this post and, quite frankly, they deserve it. Back when we didn’t have DVR’s, the Internet or a scad of other technological advancements that allowed for real-time, absolute tracking of audiences or advertising effectiveness, Nielson’s “best estimates” were accepted as good numbers. Entire business plans were built on their methodology and reports.
We don’t have to keep doing business that way, do we?
We count clicks off of ads on Web sites, opens on e-mails, responses off of direct mail pieces – why do we have to accept this kind of blather from Nielson as “good enough” effort? It’s not.
A big part of the problem, I suspect, is that half of the advertising and PR world is still fixated on “audience delivery” as the most important measurement when that’s not what really matters, anyway. “Absolute metrics” count the transactions that matter, not the feel good numbers used to justify jobs (ad equivalencies, GRP’s, pass-along circulation, etc.).
Technorati Tags: Marketing, Advertising, Television Advertising, DVR, TiVO, Nielson, GRP, TRP, Circulation, Pass-along, Absolute Metrics