Posted by Mike Bawden under Uncategorized
Comments Off
I have to admit that although I read Steve Rubel’s Micropersuasion blog almost every day, most of the stuff on it is a little too blog-centric for me. This post, though, about reshaping the media interview is exactly why I read Steve’s blog regularly.
Why re-shape the media interview? If you know Steve, he’s a huge proponent of transparency and collaboration. Here’s a taste:
“There’s a lot of room to innovate here. So many of the good quotes, anecdotes and news nuggets never see the light of day because they’re left on the cutting room floor. Given that a lot of reporters have blogs, I am wondering if we can begin to open this entire process up.
“For instance, what if reporters posted their questions out in the ‘sphere and allowed prospective sources to respond either in comments or by linking to/trackbacking the post. This would give the reporter potentially infinite sound bites and anecdotes to choose from. Even better, they could let us vote for the best quotes as they come in. Some journalists are already using their blogs to find interview sources, but no one I am aware of is taking it to this next step.”
There’s lots of good stuff here. Steve’s suggestions would make the media interview more of an open conversation between journalist(s) and source(s). Such an interview technique might make an interesting spectator sport (somewhere between rugby and professional jousting) but, in reviewing the comments on Steve’s post so far, the quality of the resulting story might be compromised.
I disagree with the neighsayers, though. I get that journalists don’t neccessarily want to be a part of the story – and that’s what would happen with an open interview process like this. But isn’t it possible that this kind of interview process could motivate news consumers to get more involved in issues and stories?
There will always be a need for writers who can tell a good story based on their one-on-one conversations, observations and research. Not every news consumer will want to drink from this firehose. But the empowering aspect of an open conversation may help people realize we’re not all that different from one another and, as a result, lead to productive consensus-building rather than the alternative.
Thanks for the thought-provoking post, Steve.
Technorati Tags: PR, Public Relations, Media Relations, Media Interviews, Feature Stories, Steve Rubel, Micropersuasion